Political Mailer Claims Affirmative Action Harmful to Asian Americans

Pro-affirmative action Asian American protesters outside the Supreme Court. (Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund)

Rafu staff report

The Washington, DC-based America First Legal Foundation condemns affirmative action political mail being distributed as harmful to Asian Americans.

The mailer, which did not specify any candidate or ballot measure, read in part: “Biden and the left want to decide who gets hired and who gets fired based on the color of their skin. Pilots are also selected based on skin color – not flying ability.

“Now Hiring – Requirements: College degree, 3-5 years experience, must be Black or Latino. Whites and Asians need not apply.

“Joe Biden and left-wing officials have engaged in widespread racial discrimination against white and Asian Americans — even though it’s against the law.

“One of Biden’s first executive orders was to mandate racial ‘equity’ as a central policy of the US government. ‘Equity’ is a code word for excluding people from jobs, college admissions, government and financial benefits based on the color of their skin.

Includes clippings from mailer Newsweek, The Wall Street Journal and other publications.

America First Legal Foundation’s Mission Statement: “We believe that all Americans deserve a government that puts their needs, their interests, and their country first. This is the sacred duty of every elected leader. This is the system established by our founding fathers. It is the precious heritage of every American citizen.

“Yet America First principles are under attack now more than ever. Our security, our freedom, our sovereignty and our basic rights and values ​​are being systematically dismantled by an unholy alliance of corrupt special interests, big tech titans, fake news media and liberal Washington politicians.

“We founded America First Legal to save our country from this organized campaign. With your support, we will oppose the anti-jobs, anti-freedom, anti-faith, anti-border, anti-police and anti-Americanism of the radical left.

The group’s chairman is Stephen Miller, a former senior adviser to the president during the Trump administration.

Positions of candidates

Affirmative action has been raised as an issue in California’s 45th raceTh The congressional district is between two Asian Americans — Republican incumbent Michelle Steele, who was born in South Korea and raised in Japan, and Democratic challenger Jay Chen, whose parents immigrated from Taiwan.

In an Oct. 31 tweet, Steele wrote, “Jay Chen has spent the last 12 years working to incorporate the Chinese Communist Party’s Confucian institutions into American classrooms, but when it comes to ensuring Asian Americans get into college classrooms, he hasn’t been so helpful.

Lire Aussi :  Latest on Idaho murders: College students’ autopsies released as surviving roommates may be ‘key’ to solving case

“As well as his support for CIs, Chen became involved in advocating for race-based selection at universities across the country, which discriminated against Asian Americans.

“Chen’s advocacy for affirmative action is so entrenched that he went on Tucker Carlson, where he actually denied that students were being penalized because of their race.

“Chen’s push for affirmative action disproportionately affects Asian Americans. Michelle Steele has been advocating for Asian Americans and fighting for affirmative action for decades. She has:

“Sen. Ted Cruz and 80 of his congressional colleagues led an amicus brief in support of the plaintiffs. SFFA v. Harvard.

“The Helping Applicants Receive Fair and Reasonable Decisions (HARVARD) Act was introduced, which promotes transparency in institutions of higher education, by requiring applicants to list the use of their personality traits in admissions decisions. If they fail to do so, they will be ineligible for Title 4 federal funding.

“I believe that students should have the opportunity to apply and get into colleges based on their own merits,” he said during a hearing by the Education and Labor Committee about these discriminatory policies.

“Supported and campaigned for California’s Proposition 209 in 1996, which banned racial preferences in public hiring, education, and contracting. Subsequently, minority graduation rates improved dramatically. In 2020, California Democrats introduced Proposition 16 to bring back racial preferences in hiring, hiring, and our education system. He campaigned against this discrimination and it was again rejected.

“AAPI testified before the House Judiciary Committee about the way discrimination and affirmative action hurt students in schools nationwide.”

After appearing on Carlson’s show in 2016, Chen said, “The whole premise of his question is invalid, which is, ‘If you’re Asian with high test scores and you don’t get into Harvard, it’s because of your race.’ You’re not a legacy, don’t play lacrosse or sail, didn’t go to a feeder private school, or don’t your dad donate $2.5 million to Harvard like the president-elect’s son.-law. Getting into Harvard isn’t just about SAT scores.

“If this conservative attack on affirmative action is really about protecting Asian Americans, why do they explain the fact that 60% of the student body’s white students have significantly lower test scores than Asian American students? Statistically, and by their own logic, more white students unfairly spot Asians than Latino or African Americans. Taking, so where is the lawsuit?

Lire Aussi :  Fans brace for politically charged U.S.-Iran match at World Cup

“No, their focus is on affirmative action and the minority who can benefit from it. Don’t be fooled by the rhetoric, Asian Americans are being used as a wedge in this debate.

Supreme Court Arguments

On Monday, the issue was brought to the Supreme Court, which will consider whether colleges and universities can continue to consider race as an admissions factor. Opponents of affirmative action argued that Harvard and the University of North Carolina violated equal protection principles, undermined the hopes of a color-blind society, and discriminated against Asian Americans.

One of those opponents is Students for Fair Admissions, which describes itself as “a nonprofit membership group of more than 20,000 students, parents, and students who believe that racial classifications and preferences in college admissions are unfair, unnecessary, and unconstitutional. Our mission is to support and participate in litigation that restores the founding principles of our nation’s civil rights movement: A student’s race and ethnicity should not be factors that harm or help that student gain admission to a competitive university.

The New York-based Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund rejects allegations that race-conscious admissions policies discriminate against Asian Americans or perpetuate harmful stereotypes against them.

“The Asian American community is vast and diverse, including first-generation college students and children whose parents’ careers earned them immigration; children of working-class refugees and multigenerational Americans; speakers of more than 300 languages; aspiring entrepreneurs, artists, teachers and more,” AALDEF said.

According to AALDEF, SFFA relies on “manipulation dates” to demonstrate that Asian Americans with high test scores are admitted at lower rates than other racial groups.

ECAASU (East Coast Asian American Student Union) said in a statement on October 31, “Today, the Supreme Court is hearing two cases on race-conscious admissions at Harvard and the University of North Carolina. Opponents are trying to use Asian Americans as a wedge against other communities of color.

“But we’re not here for that. We defend #diversity. We stand with 121 Asian American institutions and a coalition of activists supporting race-conscious access in higher education.

“Contrary to what anti-affirmative action activists assert, Asian Americans benefit from an admissions process that allows us to present our wholeness in the college application process.

“Two-thirds of Asian Americans support affirmative action, according to an @AAPIData poll conducted in English, Cantonese, Mandarin, Korean and Vietnamese.”

Lire Aussi :  Volunteers of America Eastern Washington will add behavioral health services with $4 million federal grant

Melinda Samaratunga, OCA-Asian Pacific American Advocates Policy Intern and Sri-Lankan American graduate of Columbia University, wrote in an opinion piece, “Affirmative action has divided the Asian American community: while some supported the challengers in the Harvard case, others joined. OCA-Asian Pacific American Advocates and Asian Americans Advancing Justice | AAJC, which advocates for affirmative action…

“As Asian Americans, it is easy to fall into the trap of resisting affirmative action because we think it will harm us. However, it is critical to reconcile America’s racial history with the need for restorative programs like affirmative action. We as Asian Americans must advocate for affirmative action to reject the exploitation of our identities and demand equity for America’s most marginalized populations.

“As Asian Americans we can be confused as to how affirmative action might affect us, because it is sometimes suggested that affirmative action pulls opportunities away from Asian Americans and toward other racial groups. In reality, however, it is critical for our racial group to support this policy; if Asian Americans oppose affirmative action, it is for white supremacy.” We fall into the trap of exploiting our identities.

“Even before the civil rights of Chinese immigrants were revoked in the 1860s, Asian Americans have historically benefited from the pursuit of anti-black policies … For example, the idea that Asian Americans succeeded independently is a model minority myth. From black inclusion; it is a white construction, a white decision to resist racially conscious programs without appearing racist. It allowed the takers to…

“Asian Americans have become pawns to advance the anti-black interests of white men. For example, the Harvard Supreme Court case was brought by Students for Fair Admissions, founded by white conservative strategist Edward Blum…Does Blum care so much about the well-being of Asian Americans? Or does he want us to keep blacks out of higher education?” Using?

“Furthermore, like black people, Asian Americans have benefited from — and continue to benefit from — affirmative action … Such race-conscious programs level the playing field between white Americans and people of color … It is simply irrational to oppose a policy that empowers and benefits one’s own community.

“Asian Americans must actively support affirmative action to benefit our own people and resist exploitation by white decision-makers.”


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Related Articles

Back to top button